Archives
Overview
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
Online Strategies Summer 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Online Strategies Spring 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
Online Strategies Winter 2008
December 2007
November 2007
Online Strategies Fall 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
Online Strategies Summer 2007
July 2007
June 2007
Perspective: Europe 2007
May 2007
April 2007
Perspective: Asia 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
Perspective Latin America 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Perspective Europe 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004

Losing Our Religion

Amid conjecture attempting to explain why infomercial results are steadily declining, a lack of innovative products, media fragmentation and rates typically attract the harshest scrutiny among the line-up of usual suspects. But the fact is, exactly how consumers find our paid programs has always been a bit of a mystery. Logic suggests that there are two primary ways viewers find infomercials. One, they tune into a preferred channel or network looking for something else when--violá!--they discover your magnum opus on a hand blender and stick around for the dénouement we fondly refer to as the call to action. The second way is via the happy accident known as channel surfing. According to this theory, a viewer with the attention span of my schipperke taking in the scents of the local dog park is suddenly brought to a grinding halt by something as spectacular as, let's say, a ladder you can use on stairs that costs over $300.

But as REM once sang, "It's the end of the world as we know it..."-- though I'm not sure anyone is feeling fine. Why? Because, as electronic programming guides (EPGs) continue their march into digital television households, the manner in which consumers navigate TV fundamentally changes forever. In the process, we are getting left in the dust. EPGs are menu-driven guides that break programming down into neat little categories such as "movies," "sports" and "religion." When you click on a category, a list of current programs is served up and can be navigated effortlessly, instantly satisfying a viewer's appetite for a particular type of entertainment. If you jump to a show and it isn't exactly what you had in mind, similar programming surrounds your selection, so a viewer's surfing tends to be restricted to a limited range.

When you combine this phenomenon with limitless choice and technology that conspires to eliminate advertising altogether, it suggests that unless we do something about the situation, those of us who make a career out of infomercials may be going the way of the milkman, who no doubt has fond memories. I'd just like to see us keep ours in the present and future.

So what can we do? For one, get "home shopping," which includes not only the TV shopping networks, but all paid programs as well, listed as a category on the EPGs so that our consumers have a fighting chance of finding our version of "religion." Just imagine the marketing opportunity presented by being able to come up with a title for your paid program to entice viewers (i.e., "Hope for a hidden problem!"). At the recent ERA Annual Convention in Las Vegas, the industry clearly grasped the reality that ours is a multi-channel universe.

Yet, DRTV still acts as the dominant hub that many of the other spokes of an integrated program run off of and rely on to maintain their vitality. As the aphorism suggests, adapt or die. Can I get a witness?

Rick Petry, a partner with Downstream, is a consultant to the direct marketing industry. He can be reached via e-mail at rick.petry@downstream.com.

 

Copyright © 2008 Electronic Retailer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Subscriber Services
Powered by MindFire