Archives
Overview
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
Online Strategies Summer 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Online Strategies Spring 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
Online Strategies Winter 2008
December 2007
November 2007
Online Strategies Fall 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
Online Strategies Summer 2007
July 2007
June 2007
Perspective: Europe 2007
May 2007
April 2007
Perspective: Asia 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
Perspective Latin America 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Perspective Europe 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004

Affiliate Networks: CPA vs. Traditional

By Kristopher B. Jones

Affiliate marketing issues are of utmost interest to the direct response industry, and it's easy to see why. The affiliate marketing space has been growing by leaps and bounds over the past several years. At the same time, leading direct response companies such as Guthy-Renker Corporation and others have demonstrated that affiliate marketing is an effective marketing channel for direct marketers, worthy of considerable resource allocation, including dedicated personnel and significant media dollars.

While there appears to be a general consensus that affiliate marketing works well within the direct response industry, two of the most commonly asked questions are: 1) "what affiliate marketing network should I use?" and 2) "which payout structure is best?" These questions become especially important when you take into consideration the emergence of new affiliate marketing opportunities in the form of cost-per-action (CPA) networks, which may be especially well suited for direct response companies. Unlike traditional affiliate marketing networks that tend to pay affiliates on a percentage-of-sale basis, CPA networks pay affiliates on a flat cost-per-action or lead basis.

TRADITIONAL VS. CPA NETWORKS
The "Big Three" of traditional affiliate networks are Commission Junction, Linkshare and DoubleClick Performics. Traditional affiliate networks predominantly pay affiliates on a percentage-of-sale basis. This type of network payout structure works best for businesses that have considerable variability in average order size or who prefer to incentivize affiliates for generating larger-than-average order sizes. Keep in mind that traditional affiliate networks also offer cost-per-action and flat lead-based affiliate payout structures--however, the majority of merchants and affiliates on traditional networks opt for a percentage-of-sale payout. Leading merchants with affiliate programs on traditional affiliate networks include Target, Overstock.com and Apple.

In contrast to traditional affiliate networks, CPA affiliate networks focus exclusively on a cost-per-action or pay-per-lead affiliate payout structure. The leading CPA affiliate networks are AzoogleAds, Hydra Network and CPA Empire. CPA affiliate networks perform especially well for subscription-based products, as well as businesses with few products or minimal variation in order size. Leading merchants such as Blockbuster, Orange Glo and Match.com have successful affiliate programs on CPA affiliate networks.

While it may seem that your product is a good fit for a particular network type, you may want to consider launching your program on multiple networks. For instance, Match.com, Blockbuster, VistaPrint and others successfully manage affiliate programs on both traditional and CPA networks. Why? Doing so gives you the ability to test different payout structures and experiment with different offers--one of the keys to success for direct marketers.

Kristopher B. Jones is president and CEO of Pepperjam, one of the fastest-growing Internet marketing agencies. He can be reached at kris@pepperjamsearch.com.

 

Copyright © 2008 Electronic Retailer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Subscriber Services
Powered by MindFire