Archives
Overview
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
Online Strategies Summer 2008
June 2008
May 2008
Online Strategies Spring 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
Online Strategies Winter 2008
December 2007
November 2007
Online Strategies Fall 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
Online Strategies Summer 2007
July 2007
June 2007
Perspective: Europe 2007
May 2007
April 2007
Perspective: Asia 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
Perspective Latin America 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Perspective Europe 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004

The Super Bowl of Blood Sports

Recently, I attended a marketing conference devoted to what to do in a world where the balance of power has shifted forever to consumers who can now avoid or opt in for advertising messages, with the flick of a thumb akin to a Roman spectator deciding the fate of a fallen gladiator. With the advent of the PVR and VOD, viewers can effortlessly slay commercial messages that render the interruptive advertising model dead. So there we were asking ourselves, "What is the new paradigm?"

Obviously, these new technologies change the playing field forever because they allow consumers to decouple content from any prescribed time or means of delivery. Hence, TV becomes even more "hits" driven and it is the individual title, say, "Lost," that is leaving more than housewives desperate. The value of a network as a primary channel of distribution may be in serious jeopardy, with alternatives such as broadband streaming content over the Internet.

The implications for this are perhaps even worse for television advertisers. The head of research for one of the major networks shared preliminary research data that polled consumers about whether they would pay $1 for an on-demand episode of a new show sans commercials versus 50 cents for one with advertising. The results were split about evenly, but the more frightening revelation may have been his assertion that under the current ad supported model, each viewer is worth about 36 cents in revenues to the network. Therefore, every VOD click at $1 represents an increase that is nearly 2.8 times over the old advertising-reliant model and billions more in gross income. The executive might as well have pronounced, "We don't need no stinking advertisers!"

Before those of us who derive our livelihood from ballyhoo go into a full-tilt panic, let's not lose sight of an interesting dichotomy playing out right beneath our noses. On the one hand, while consumers are skipping, dodging and obliterating our marketing messages, in the online world the same public willingly seeks out and opts in for variations of the same communication. Perhaps, home shopping networks have it just right when they act as alternative programming--we'll call it shopping as sport--that fosters connections and community that lead to transactions.

Which reminds me of another community built around sport--our modern day version of a gladiator match--the Super Bowl. Folks gather from far and wide to socialize, eat, drink and be riveted by...advertising. All of which suggests that there are audiences for our self-serving content that in its purest form is alternative entertainment. We just need to find the optimal mix of disciplines within the marketing arsenal that allows them to find us and engage. Some might call this a bloody mess, but then it's the primal challenge of such activities that draw all of us into the arena.

Rick Petry, a partner with Downstream, is a consultant to the direct marketing industry. He can be reached via e-mail at rick.petry@downstream.com.

 

Copyright © 2008 Electronic Retailer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Subscriber Services
Powered by MindFire